Australia does not have enough troops to make a difference, and it's utterly stupid to back the US in an illegal attack.
Albanese, in case you forget, you are the PM of Australia not a lowly state of America. There are already enough targets in Australia that the US was allowed by our governments to have, we do not need any more, so stop with the bravado, you have a wedding to plan, or is it put off again?
Shayrat Redux? Trump's 'Invisible' Fleet Leaves Mirage of 'Devastation' in Iran
Simplicius
Jun 23
Well, Trump did it again: under cover of giving Iran “two weeks” negotiating time, he instead launched a covert attack as soon as the assets were in place, later telling ‘Meet the Press’ that he said he would make the decision within two weeks, and two days technically falls in that time scale.
Trump endorsed strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities at a meeting with advisers on Wednesday. His talk of a negotiating period on Thursday was a deliberate deception and "smokescreen," The Atlantic claims.
First, let us briefly overview how the strikes reportedly went down. Chatter erupted yesterday when B-2s and refueling craft took off from their homebase of Whiteman AFB and began tracking west toward Guam (for further refueling) and Diego Garcia. However, that “visible” strike package was the decoy, while the real package flew east from mainland US under complete cover, to hit Iran directly from its western flank.
In reality, the subterfuge appeared part of an elaborate game, given that emerging details point to the entire charade being just that.
There are various reports going around that through the usual Swiss back channels Trump’s administration essentially informed Iran of the strikes, implying that as long as Iran does not respond it will be a ‘one-off’ attack. If true, this would be clear indication that the proposed back-channel agreement would require Iran allow the US strike package to pass unmolested, to give the US its face-saving off-ramp from the conflict. This was one of the possibilities we predicted days ago in the premium article and now seems increasingly likely to be the case.
But the big question is, what really happened: was the strike entirely fake, as some suggest? Recall that there is zero evidence any B-2s even flew over Iran, with the package including dozens of fired Tomahawk missiles. Many are now spouting off about the day’s favored word of ‘subsidence’ caused by the bunker busters, but not all experts are convinced, like this ex-US artillery officer who knows a thing or two about shell craters:
Now that imagery has emerged, I think my take from last night is vindicated - the damage seen thus far is not consistent with extremely large "bunker-buster" bombs but with lighter standoff weapons that caused only surface damage. The Iranians also clearly had ample warning.
It’s possible the craters are merely from the US Tomahawks, confirmed to have been launched from a nearby sub, though they do look large enough to be from a much more powerful weapon.
My personal take, though, is that most likely a back-channel agreement was made for the B-2s to have safe passage to do a limited ‘show strike’.
The evidence?
Firstly, the fact that it was a small strike, which even experts agree utilized far fewer MOPs (Mass Ordnance Penetrators) than required. The problem is, since half the operative B-2 fleet was used as ‘diversion’, the remaining half (7 x B-2s) could only carry 14 x total penetrators, and these had to be divided between several facilities including Natanz, on top of Fordow. That means Fordow only received six hits, far fewer than needed. For it to receive more, the B-2s would have had to do numerous runs, or extended the campaign—which could have gotten messily off-script. By signaling a ‘token’ strike, Trump likely mollified Iran into not responding.
The second piece of evidence is that—besides the various intel and rumors of back channel deals—new satellite imagery revealed that Iran had dozens of dump trucks carrying out “unusual activity” at Fordow two days before the attack: press conference:
close to 1500 subscribers fuck knuckle to your 65. Yeah -people don't subscribe. I'm sure your mother and wife subscribe to mine too. I do know one thing, your Mrs is great in bed.l.
One of the main, perhaps only, Trump’s objectives is creation of ever-Greater Israel. He never hid that….
The only filter for Trump's administration members was and is —a total dedication to Zionism and Great Israel, therefore to the US genocide of Palestinians. Hence the unconstitutional and unprecedented “antisemitism” terror and censorship in the US.
Always remember that when Benjamin Netanyahu Mileikowsky visits US he often stays at the estate of Trump’s daughter, Ivanka (Trump) Kushner. And that Trump is demanding that all corruption charges against war criminal Mileikowsky-Netanyahu be dropped.
Also remember, Israel sterilized Ethiopian Jewish immigrant women… - for purity of Ashkenazi blood == racism
“War Never Changes"
The fields are green where poppies grow,
Yet blood still seeps in rows below.
The drums still beat, the banners fly,
And mothers’ sons still go to die.
The speeches roar with righteous fire,
The young march forth, their hearts aspire—
But mud and smoke and screams remain,
The same old tale, the same old pain.
The generals plot on maps so wide,
While soldiers bleed in crimson tide.
The names, the guns, the faces turn,
Yet history’s flames still rage and burn.
From spear to sword, from bomb to drone,
The cries echo in blood and bone.
The world may shift, the years rearrange,
But war—oh war—it never changes.
May you reap what you have sown!
Here's a piece of advice to you you imbecile - fuck if.
Australia does not have enough troops to make a difference, and it's utterly stupid to back the US in an illegal attack.
Albanese, in case you forget, you are the PM of Australia not a lowly state of America. There are already enough targets in Australia that the US was allowed by our governments to have, we do not need any more, so stop with the bravado, you have a wedding to plan, or is it put off again?
They have probably been told it is theatre.
Shayrat Redux? Trump's 'Invisible' Fleet Leaves Mirage of 'Devastation' in Iran
Simplicius
Jun 23
Well, Trump did it again: under cover of giving Iran “two weeks” negotiating time, he instead launched a covert attack as soon as the assets were in place, later telling ‘Meet the Press’ that he said he would make the decision within two weeks, and two days technically falls in that time scale.
Trump endorsed strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities at a meeting with advisers on Wednesday. His talk of a negotiating period on Thursday was a deliberate deception and "smokescreen," The Atlantic claims.
First, let us briefly overview how the strikes reportedly went down. Chatter erupted yesterday when B-2s and refueling craft took off from their homebase of Whiteman AFB and began tracking west toward Guam (for further refueling) and Diego Garcia. However, that “visible” strike package was the decoy, while the real package flew east from mainland US under complete cover, to hit Iran directly from its western flank.
In reality, the subterfuge appeared part of an elaborate game, given that emerging details point to the entire charade being just that.
There are various reports going around that through the usual Swiss back channels Trump’s administration essentially informed Iran of the strikes, implying that as long as Iran does not respond it will be a ‘one-off’ attack. If true, this would be clear indication that the proposed back-channel agreement would require Iran allow the US strike package to pass unmolested, to give the US its face-saving off-ramp from the conflict. This was one of the possibilities we predicted days ago in the premium article and now seems increasingly likely to be the case.
But the big question is, what really happened: was the strike entirely fake, as some suggest? Recall that there is zero evidence any B-2s even flew over Iran, with the package including dozens of fired Tomahawk missiles. Many are now spouting off about the day’s favored word of ‘subsidence’ caused by the bunker busters, but not all experts are convinced, like this ex-US artillery officer who knows a thing or two about shell craters:
Now that imagery has emerged, I think my take from last night is vindicated - the damage seen thus far is not consistent with extremely large "bunker-buster" bombs but with lighter standoff weapons that caused only surface damage. The Iranians also clearly had ample warning.
It’s possible the craters are merely from the US Tomahawks, confirmed to have been launched from a nearby sub, though they do look large enough to be from a much more powerful weapon.
My personal take, though, is that most likely a back-channel agreement was made for the B-2s to have safe passage to do a limited ‘show strike’.
The evidence?
Firstly, the fact that it was a small strike, which even experts agree utilized far fewer MOPs (Mass Ordnance Penetrators) than required. The problem is, since half the operative B-2 fleet was used as ‘diversion’, the remaining half (7 x B-2s) could only carry 14 x total penetrators, and these had to be divided between several facilities including Natanz, on top of Fordow. That means Fordow only received six hits, far fewer than needed. For it to receive more, the B-2s would have had to do numerous runs, or extended the campaign—which could have gotten messily off-script. By signaling a ‘token’ strike, Trump likely mollified Iran into not responding.
The second piece of evidence is that—besides the various intel and rumors of back channel deals—new satellite imagery revealed that Iran had dozens of dump trucks carrying out “unusual activity” at Fordow two days before the attack: press conference:
Of course she does, because we have never been living in a democracy and the empire runs on brjwn toddler souls.
What a waste of space of a government, sure does not represent me, or anyone that can see through their lies.
close to 1500 subscribers fuck knuckle to your 65. Yeah -people don't subscribe. I'm sure your mother and wife subscribe to mine too. I do know one thing, your Mrs is great in bed.l.
lol.ll but you do fuck wit.
Yes you were right my friend but he's better than the alternative and that's not saying much.
Australia is a British colonial settlement just like Israel and the US. Throw Canada in too. Birds of a feather...
Yes. Israel is an ally to the US. What are you talking about??? They keep saying “Death to America” and want to wipe Israel off the map. ‼️
lol you’re a clown
You’re a FOOL and no wonder no one subscribes to your foolishness.
She did. But she's wong.
One of the main, perhaps only, Trump’s objectives is creation of ever-Greater Israel. He never hid that….
The only filter for Trump's administration members was and is —a total dedication to Zionism and Great Israel, therefore to the US genocide of Palestinians. Hence the unconstitutional and unprecedented “antisemitism” terror and censorship in the US.
Always remember that when Benjamin Netanyahu Mileikowsky visits US he often stays at the estate of Trump’s daughter, Ivanka (Trump) Kushner. And that Trump is demanding that all corruption charges against war criminal Mileikowsky-Netanyahu be dropped.
Also remember, Israel sterilized Ethiopian Jewish immigrant women… - for purity of Ashkenazi blood == racism
Remember how happy you were when Albanese was elected? I told you, nothing would change.