Obeisance is a characteristic all Australian governments have shown when it comes to doing what the US wants - blind naivety has led it to many paths of anguish and suffering.
Exactly. Hence why they want him gone, but they can't get rid of him. No proxy way, no colour revolution, no civilian uprising, nothing. Hence why they demonise him, attempt to discredit him, call him insane, a dictator, ruthless murderer and yet everything they say he is, they are themselves. Fascinating how projection works to expose the realities of personalities and dishonesty.
That's right Mary the last Australian to stand up to the Americans was the late Gough Whitlam. The CIA played an integral part in undermining his position as Prime Minister of Australia, that inevitably lead to the Queen dismissing him as Prime Minister and the government which led to a constitutional crisis in Australia.
From what I know I am thinking that they all get threatened and are just gutless and roll over rather than actually stand against corruption as they should... they only stand against corruption when they are assured they have backup... a shame they were not open and honest and they would have the people of their country behind them rather than against them...
Putin knows how western leaders are gutless and useless, which is why they hate him... he does not roll over and be bullied or directed by anyone but his own heart and mind... something western leaders don’t want to expose that they do not do... they don’t actually make independent decisions on any front
Australia has sold its soul to USA. Actually gave it freely. We're America's lapdog. Begging for bones. It's so fkd up. AUKUS WILL FUKUS. Neither major party have our interests at all. It's "how high" when America asks us to jump...
Good article George. Well we’re just the 51st State now aren’t we …….so appeasing Israeli needs goes with the territory. Appalling. Shame on them. Don’t forget Pine Gap too ….. the more we tie ourselves to the US, the bigger a target we become - commonsense 101. All power to the Greens for asking the questions….
I imagine those making these decisions ARE concerned about the physical security of Australians...as many as dozen or two of them, specifically themselves. Going against orders from Washington (and its homicidal little brother) is quite dangerous to one's political career, and quite possible there are more personal threats leveled in private rooms if any Australian leader (or the Brits, or EU etc) question these orders. The last Australian to try it was in '74, right? I learned about that from Catlin Johnstone.
Australia already have a problem with a government that refuses to recognise the harm caused by the mRNA vaccine and has been very "economical with the truth". With Naomi Wolf's The Pfizer Papers more merde is about the hit the fan, and the Australian government only seems to have provided cover for Pfizer. Are western governments even aware that people see their lies and their prioritising questionable and risky foreign policy over them, and losing trust by the day? Do they care? It worries me that don't seem to.
Wolf is committed to the notion that vaccines are bad & will not be swayed. It makes no sense to pay attention to people with such convictions, they are incapable of giving you accurate information.
Complaining about vaccines makes as much sense as complaining about the Immune System. They only work THROUGH your immune system by provoking an Immune Response prior to exposure to the real pathogen. You get a head start - that's it.
Every single time you are exposed to someone shedding dead virus - you may get an Immune Response & this is functionally identical to getting an Inactivated Vaccine. The vaccine is more controlled & predictable - therefore safer than hanging around recovering people that may still be shedding live virus.
Provoking an Immune Response is the very opposite of a Bioweapon.
There is no reason for governments to give a "Bioweapon" to everyone they can in their population. If they wanted to eradicate some "undesirables", give it to them alone - not everyone they can convince to take it.
Governments that are funded by Taxation generally want to broaden their Tax Base, not comprehensively destroy it. Even when governments or other organisations rely on literal forced labor are forced to contend with conditions that are unhealthy for the slaves. If they have a need for unskilled labor & have more than enough to replace the deaths - ONLY THEN is it possible to sustain practices lethal to the slaves.
Newsflash : The bulk of the modern world uses skilled labor.
Vaccines don't have to be produced for profit.
It doesn't follow that vaccine proponents are beholden to vaccine companies - some like myself are opposed to those companies & the private ownership of medical patents.
It's wild to me that Antivaxxers tend to accuse Vaccine advocates of being BOTH communist and agents of vaccine profiteers. FFS, PICK ONE - they are mutually exclusive.
Pure sophistry sir. You seem unaware that some humans are pathological, whether pathological liars or worse, actively killing humans. Bill Gates, his father and many others are eugenicists. Consider that. The shots are poison in many ways, and if you don’t understand that fact you’re hopelessly indoctrinated. The only other choice would be you have a vested interest in promoting the clot shots.
As assuming people have a profit motive is your Go To when people disagree, why don't you focus on DOCUMENTED PROOF of Gates active defence of Vaccine Profiteering?
It's like you are having a conversation with yourself in your own head - you are presenting conclusions to me without sharing what premises to a logical argument - which should be the basis of your conclusion.
I refuse to speculate or dig through search results for Eugenics & Bill Gates. Your conclusion, you bring your evidence & sources.
It's not facts & logic you offer, it is religious dogma with the necessary appeal to emotion.
Speaking of 'vaccines', did you notice the Pope advocating for the shots? Does the Pope have the authority over the bodies of his fans? Did you also advocate for government authority over the bodies of citizens?
Exactly. Hence why they want him gone, but they can't get rid of him. No proxy way, no colour revolution, no civilian uprising, nothing. Hence why they demonise him, attempt to discredit him, call him insane, a dictator, ruthless murderer and yet everything they say he is, they are themselves. Fascinating how projection works to expose the realities of personalities and dishonesty.
That's right Mary the last Australian to stand up to the Americans was the late Gough Whitlam. The CIA played an integral part in undermining his position as Prime Minister of Australia, that inevitably lead to the Queen dismissing him as Prime Minister and the government which led to a constitutional crisis in Australia.
From what I know I am thinking that they all get threatened and are just gutless and roll over rather than actually stand against corruption as they should... they only stand against corruption when they are assured they have backup... a shame they were not open and honest and they would have the people of their country behind them rather than against them...
Putin knows how western leaders are gutless and useless, which is why they hate him... he does not roll over and be bullied or directed by anyone but his own heart and mind... something western leaders don’t want to expose that they do not do... they don’t actually make independent decisions on any front
And their credibility. Making backroom deals with international pariahs are tantamount to political suicide.
Australia has sold its soul to USA. Actually gave it freely. We're America's lapdog. Begging for bones. It's so fkd up. AUKUS WILL FUKUS. Neither major party have our interests at all. It's "how high" when America asks us to jump...
We sure are Judy
Good article George. Well we’re just the 51st State now aren’t we …….so appeasing Israeli needs goes with the territory. Appalling. Shame on them. Don’t forget Pine Gap too ….. the more we tie ourselves to the US, the bigger a target we become - commonsense 101. All power to the Greens for asking the questions….
I imagine those making these decisions ARE concerned about the physical security of Australians...as many as dozen or two of them, specifically themselves. Going against orders from Washington (and its homicidal little brother) is quite dangerous to one's political career, and quite possible there are more personal threats leveled in private rooms if any Australian leader (or the Brits, or EU etc) question these orders. The last Australian to try it was in '74, right? I learned about that from Catlin Johnstone.
Australia already have a problem with a government that refuses to recognise the harm caused by the mRNA vaccine and has been very "economical with the truth". With Naomi Wolf's The Pfizer Papers more merde is about the hit the fan, and the Australian government only seems to have provided cover for Pfizer. Are western governments even aware that people see their lies and their prioritising questionable and risky foreign policy over them, and losing trust by the day? Do they care? It worries me that don't seem to.
Wolf is committed to the notion that vaccines are bad & will not be swayed. It makes no sense to pay attention to people with such convictions, they are incapable of giving you accurate information.
Complaining about vaccines makes as much sense as complaining about the Immune System. They only work THROUGH your immune system by provoking an Immune Response prior to exposure to the real pathogen. You get a head start - that's it.
Every single time you are exposed to someone shedding dead virus - you may get an Immune Response & this is functionally identical to getting an Inactivated Vaccine. The vaccine is more controlled & predictable - therefore safer than hanging around recovering people that may still be shedding live virus.
If you're with Kline, you'll do fine.
If you're with Wolf, you dun goofed.
Do you frequently post falsehoods? Perhaps you simply work for Pharma. The shots are bioweapons pure and simple.
Provoking an Immune Response is the very opposite of a Bioweapon.
There is no reason for governments to give a "Bioweapon" to everyone they can in their population. If they wanted to eradicate some "undesirables", give it to them alone - not everyone they can convince to take it.
Governments that are funded by Taxation generally want to broaden their Tax Base, not comprehensively destroy it. Even when governments or other organisations rely on literal forced labor are forced to contend with conditions that are unhealthy for the slaves. If they have a need for unskilled labor & have more than enough to replace the deaths - ONLY THEN is it possible to sustain practices lethal to the slaves.
Newsflash : The bulk of the modern world uses skilled labor.
Vaccines don't have to be produced for profit.
It doesn't follow that vaccine proponents are beholden to vaccine companies - some like myself are opposed to those companies & the private ownership of medical patents.
It's wild to me that Antivaxxers tend to accuse Vaccine advocates of being BOTH communist and agents of vaccine profiteers. FFS, PICK ONE - they are mutually exclusive.
Pure sophistry sir. You seem unaware that some humans are pathological, whether pathological liars or worse, actively killing humans. Bill Gates, his father and many others are eugenicists. Consider that. The shots are poison in many ways, and if you don’t understand that fact you’re hopelessly indoctrinated. The only other choice would be you have a vested interest in promoting the clot shots.
You can't point to a single thing I wrote as Sophistry, it's all Facts & Logic.
As for Bill Gates being Eugenicist - I don't know - he IS A VACCINE PROFITEER as he is well known for supporting private ownership of Vaccine Patents.
https://www.wired.com/story/opinion-the-world-loses-under-bill-gates-vaccine-colonialism/
As assuming people have a profit motive is your Go To when people disagree, why don't you focus on DOCUMENTED PROOF of Gates active defence of Vaccine Profiteering?
It's like you are having a conversation with yourself in your own head - you are presenting conclusions to me without sharing what premises to a logical argument - which should be the basis of your conclusion.
I refuse to speculate or dig through search results for Eugenics & Bill Gates. Your conclusion, you bring your evidence & sources.
It's not facts & logic you offer, it is religious dogma with the necessary appeal to emotion.
Speaking of 'vaccines', did you notice the Pope advocating for the shots? Does the Pope have the authority over the bodies of his fans? Did you also advocate for government authority over the bodies of citizens?