Reanimated wet market continues as Fauci’s Gain of Function the real story.

It’s been three years since the dubious and disturbingly complicated Anthony Fauci became a household name. 

Prior to achieving his coveted fame, Fauci was known mostly to those within the medical research community where he wielded immense power and control.   

He was ‘the’ puppet master - the man who controlled grants and everything else - and by doing so, cultivated a culture of fear. 

Up until late 2022, Fauci’s 40-year reign as the head of the NIAID and advisor to the US Government ended abruptly. 

His rock star status soured as controversy around funding of the Wuhan Virology Institute’s (WIV) Gain of Function research mounted which now appears to be the facilitator of COVID’s creation. 

So, did Fauci fund the WIV’s Gain of Function research program?

It seems so, and his resignation raises more questions than it answers, as clouds of suspicion plague him, it’s the outcome of the recent US mid-terms that appears to have cemented his call. 

Gone were the Democrat’s strength in the House, leaving Fauci exposed without the protection of a Democrat run Congress. 

The once impenetrable fortress Fauci held as supreme leader collapsed – a thought unthinkable a year ago, as evidence of his funding the largest Gain of Function research program continues to grow.  

If Fauci did, and he circumvented Congress’s ban it imposed on it, then he has not only helped unleash a pathogen the world may never reign in but is the central figure to the most devious experiment and human blunder committed in history.   

What Fauci’s helped to effect is to push out a virus and have it treated with gene therapy technology that was branded as a vaccine to dupe people into believing it was safe.

The opportunity to control COVID was lost in the early stages when it wasn’t properly dealt with, or, when medicines that did work weren’t used.

Comparing the behaviour of normal pathogens to COVID, normal pathogens don’t create the same wide scale damage COVID does. 

The harm they create is incidental – thriving only when healthy hosts can spread a virus, sparing tissues that don’t help them spread. 

But COVID is different. It invades all tissues allowing it to behave bizarrely.  

As speculation continues to rage about the legitimacy of the COVID vaccines, many of the world’s top vaccinologists who have spoken out against their development continue to maintain the vaccine isn’t a vaccine.

mRNA gene therapy doesn’t create immunity to pathogens or prevent transmission, and it remains unknown whether it creates antibodies.

Had people been told at the beginning of the Pandemic they would be taking gene therapy and not a vaccine, people would have been far less compliant – the trick was to redefine gene therapy and call it a vaccine.

Dr Geert Vanden Bossche, the world’s foremost vaccinologist and a man condemned for his commentary around COVID, but right with his analysis of it, predicts there’ll be an increase in the severity of COVID because of the vaccination program taking place, even though he says, “it’s been much slower to eventuate.”

So far, COVID’s impact has been limited to infecting tissues in the upper respiratory tract, but according to Vanden Bossche, it will start pursuing and infecting tissues further down the respiratory tract, making COVID more dangerous.

Vanden Bossche’s warnings have vaccinologists globally agreeing with the absurdity of what is taking place but remain silent because of pressure applied not to talk.

It’s been the failure to act quickly when COVID first surfaced that now sees a proliferation of variants, Vanden Bossche says, “which are out of control, and learning the infectiousness trick.”

Each person creates an opportunity for the virus to consider antibodies being induced to learn the trick of infecting more tissues.

So why does the wet market story continue to be reanimated as an explanation as a natural spill-over event when mounting evidence suggests a Gain of Function research program is the real story?

Fauci, knows he has a problem, and it worsens if ill-conceived Gain of Function research was at the heart of what took place in Wuhan at the discretion of the US.

If it isn’t, Fauci is in the clear. 

But while there remains a concerted effort to shut down any discussion around human intervention, the air of suspicion about what is being hidden grows louder and louder.

As each month passes and the evidence of an intermediate host isn’t produced, the likelihood there is one is negligible – making the WIV the host.

And so far, no creature has been found in Wuhan to suggest any evidence of anything carrying the disease.   

People have every right to hear the warnings sounded by Dr Geert Vanden Bossche, Robert Malone, Peter McCulloch ir Brett Weinstein to name some to alert us of what they know makes no scientific sense, and they and others should be allowed to express their views without being cancelled.

Whoever’s behind the folly of madness of COVID is comfortable with lives being sacrificed for their end goal.