Netanyahu’s leadership a reign of terror

What’s become a historic quagmire, the Israel-Palestinian conflict, has been further complicated by Benjamin Netanyahu’s leadership.

Netanyahu’s power is undoubtedly consumed by his belief of his right to rule – his attempt to strip the Supreme Court of its ability to block government decisions - would transfer him total control.

Netanyahu would have overnight transformed himself into a ruling demagogue – a Prime Minister of authoritarian rule with no accountability.

Since the Hamas attacks of October 7 – Netanyahu has realised his dream.

And it’s been borne out by his move to flatten Gaza after Hamas’s attacks, and they’ve not only exacerbated regional tensions but raised eyebrows - fearing the situation could spiral into a broader conflict.

Under Netanyahu's leadership, the West Bank has witnessed a steep increase in illegal Jewish settlements.

The expansions, often at the expense of Palestinian homes, have drawn global condemnation with many arguing they're not only a violation of international law but sabotaging peace efforts.

Yet, it's Gaza, where the consequences of Netanyahu's policies have been abhorrently intense and because of his extreme acts of State sanctioned terror have placed the world on a knifes edge.

Hamas’s attack of October 7 was barbaric, but Netanyahu’s treatment of the Palestinian people has been obscenely in humane, and his thirst for revenge by means of flattening Gaza and the West Bank are worse.

The intensified blockades ordered by Netanyahu - justified by Israel as a measure against Hamas, has led to a humanitarian disaster. Palestinians are now not only displaced but have been further dehumanised.

With the world watching in horror, as images emerge of Gazan civilians grappling with shortages of essential goods and medical supplies, the lives of innocence lost through mutilated bodies and a scorched earth policy – Netanyahu has a multi-layered agenda that’s been exposed.

Expansion, elimination of the Palestinian people through any means possible and access to a wealth of gas and energy is Netanyahu’s tripartite agenda.

Human rights organisations have been vocal in their condemnation, labelling the blockade a severe human rights violation.

However, the repercussions of Netanyahu's approach are not limited to the region.

Diplomatic relations, once warm, have chilled considerably. A rift with Turkey, once a close ally of Israel, has grown particularly evident.

Turkey’s President, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has frequently criticised Netanyahu's actions, marking a significant low in diplomatic ties.

The broader implications have become more disconcerting.

With global powers staking their positions — some echoing Israel's security concerns and others decrying its actions against Palestinians — the situation's volatility is clear.

Analysts fear if left unchecked, the conflict, intensified by Netanyahu, could evolve into a broader military confrontation -reminiscent of tensions which have historically led to world wars.

Netanyahu's frequent preference for military action over diplomacy has always been a contentious point.

His sidelining diplomatic efforts and resorting to force, has created an environment ripe for extremism - not only making peace elusive but risks luring other nations into the conflict.

In international forums, there's a sense of urgency to address the Israel-Palestine situation.

The United Nations has repeatedly emphasised the need for a two-state solution, a proposition seemingly unachievable under Netanyahu's reign.

His hardline stance has stifled voices of moderation and compromise, both within Israel and in Palestine.

Protests against Netanyahu's policies have become commonplace. Major cities worldwide have witnessed demonstrations calling for an end to the blockade on Gaza and a halt to settlement expansions.

The world’s solidarity with the Palestinian cause is emblematic of the widening chasm between Israel under Netanyahu's leadership and much of the international community.

Supporters of Netanyahu highlight Israel's security challenges - pointing to rocket attacks from Gaza and the rhetoric of groups like Hamas.

International observers, however, argue while Israel's security concerns are valid, Netanyahu's policies are disproportionate and more punitive than preventative.

Netanyahu's influence on Israeli politics remains strong - the hope is for a shift towards policies that prioritize dialogue over division and peace over provocation.

The Israel-Palestine conflict has always been a flashpoint, and Netanyahu's policies have consistently sparked constant tensions.

The challenge isn’t only dousing the flames but rebuild trust — a job requiring departure from the strategies of the Netanyahu era.