Howe’s War on Truth, Dean’s Descent Into Madness
Murdoch’s media machine: Howe recasts Israel’s war crimes as morality while Dean demands Albanese’s government be “destroyed.”
Rupert Murdoch isn’t a man accustomed to failure. The media baron, long the architect of right-wing propaganda and enabler of state terror and genocide, has built an empire on control. Yet now, at 94, he’s confronted with something he cannot buy or bully into submission - the collapse of the narrative he’s so ruthlessly pushed about Israel and Palestine.
Enter Alan Howe, longtime editor of the Sunday Herald Sun and former Opinion pages editor at The Australian, is one of Murdoch’s most loyal foot soldiers. Howe’s latest column in The Australian, entitled “Easiest thing to see in the Middle East? The gulf between good and evil,” isn’t journalism. It’s a desperate act of service to a boss who demands loyalty to Israel above truth, a clumsy sermon that dresses up war crimes as morality and caricatures Palestinians as savages. Howe doesn’t report — he recites. And in doing so, he exposes not only his own bankruptcy as a commentator but the rot at the heart of Murdoch’s empire.
For decades, Murdoch’s devotion to the Zionist cause has seen his newspapers and broadcasters launder Israeli crimes into stories of victimhood and virtue. His empire has flooded the public with lies and distortions, painting Israel as the beacon of “light” while branding Palestinians as agents of “darkness.” That propaganda once held sway - not anymore - the world has changed. Public opinion is shifting, Israel is increasingly recognised as a pariah state, and Murdoch is scrambling to control a narrative that’s slipping from his grasp.
His desperation is most visible in the shrill dishonesty of his flagship outlets, The Australian and Sky News. Their coverage of Gaza isn’t journalism but propaganda — a weaponised campaign to demonise Palestinians and excuse genocide.
Howe claims the conflict is a battle between “enlightened” Israel and “barbaric” Palestinians. Yet who is levelling entire neighbourhoods, starving civilians, bombing hospitals, and killing tens of thousands? Not Hamas. Israel, backed by the US and cheered on by Sky News, is carrying out a campaign of collective punishment so severe, UN experts, human rights groups, and the ICJ have all described it as genocide. To call Israel “good” while it drops US-made bombs on refugee camps is not journalism. It is complicity.
Howe portrays Hamas and Hezbollah as death cults divorced from reality. But history tells us that resistance is always branded terrorism by the occupier. The French Resistance was once dismissed as a terrorist network by Nazi Germany. Nelson Mandela remained on the US terror watchlist until 2008. Palestinians resisting occupation and dispossession are smeared in exactly the same way. This doesn’t mean every tactic of Hamas or Hezbollah must be defended. It means recognising that these movements exist because of Israel’s relentless colonisation and violence — not because Palestinians are “irrational savages,” as Howe implies.
Howe fixates on Ismail Haniyeh’s calm response to the deaths of his children, presenting dignity in grief as evidence of fanaticism. He ignores Palestinian families have endured generations of loss under Israeli siege and bombardment. Resilience isn’t fanaticism — it’s survival.
Meanwhile, Israel’s leaders openly invoke biblical genocide. Netanyahu has called Gaza’s war a “battle of light against darkness.” His ministers describe Palestinians as “human animals.” Settlers in Jerusalem chant “death to Arabs.” Yet Howe insists it’s Palestinians who embody hate. Who, then, are the extremists? Those resisting occupation, or those using F-16s to erase an entire people?
Howe repeats the tired propaganda Hamas “stole aid” and “turned pipes into rockets.” It ignores the reality of a siege that’s lasted nearly two decades, during which Israel has blocked or restricted basic materials needed to build homes, hospitals, and sanitation systems. Gaza is kept deliberately unliveable. If children die of disease and hunger, it’s because Israel designed it so. Blaming Palestinians for their misery is extraordinary victim-blaming.
Even Howe’s descent into tabloid gossip — harping on the alleged wealth of Hamas leaders — is a diversion. Corruption is hardly unique to Palestinians - Netanyahu stands trial for bribery and fraud. That detail, naturally, is absent from Howe’s sermon.
Rowan Dean’s Descent Into Madness
This propaganda isn’t isolated. It’s part of a coordinated Murdoch campaign to silence dissent and smear critics of Israel. Just this week, Sky News’ Rowan Dean accused Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of “throwing the Jewish community under the bus” — a grotesque falsehood that conflates criticism of Zionism with antisemitism. And this morning Dean spiralled further into hysteria, labelling the Albanese government a “bunch of radical communists” who must be “destroyed.”
It’s not analysis but unhinged ranting — the kind of language that corrodes democratic debate and exposes just how untethered Murdoch’s empire has become. For a broadcaster that claims to defend “Western civilisation,” Dean’s rhetoric is a dangerous echo of authoritarianism, where political opponents aren’t disagreed with but annihilated. It’s the same logic that underpins the propaganda Howe peddles in print: a worldview where opponents are stripped of legitimacy and human rights are trampled in the name of power.
Journalism should be exposing why Israel has been allowed to wage war on Gaza with US backing, why Palestinians are still denied the right to self-determination under international law, why Western leaders who cheer Ukrainian resistance to Russian occupation condemn Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation, and why criticism of Israel is smeared as antisemitism when it is, in truth, solidarity with human rights.
These questions terrify editors at Murdoch outlets, because they reveal the truth - Israel isn’t the victim but the aggressor, and Palestinians aren’t evil but the oppressed.
The real “gulf between good and evil” isn’t between Israel and Palestine. It’s between those who defend human rights and those who excuse genocide. Howe, Dean, Murdoch, and The Australian have chosen their side: with Netanyahu, with US bombs, with the machinery of oppression.
Australians deserve journalism that exposes power, not journalism that apologises for its crimes. Until then, Howe’s work — like Dean’s rants — should be read not as reporting, but as propaganda.



Why I will never send a penny in Murdoch's direction. He is an evil madman.
What these faux journalists and commentators produce can hardly be described as work and should not be read at all! It doesn’t even belong in the garbage!